Report On Year One

On this page I had hoped to link to sites that would provide evaluations and/or support for non-dualistic logic. It has not happened. After a year I have no support or criticism to link to or host.

The categories of interest that I had looked for included Hegelianism, metaphysics, transpersonal psychology, Jungian Institutes, political science faculties, theological studies [briefly], mysticism and strategic studies. There was a nil return. A handful of readers e-mailed their excitement as they started into the philosophy, but I had no conclusive comment.

In all fairness it is extremely difficult to comment on logic. You cannot use logic to express yourself. People use dialectic to make comments and logic is superior to dialectic. Therefore readers cannot endorse logic if they agree. But they should care enough to recognise and support the enterprise.

I suspect that the more gentle-minded will not like my interpretation of problems when reference to values or morality is invalid. Logic is not Judeo-Christian.

I am not embarrassed by this poor response. It does nothing for my jaundiced estimation of academics to be ignored, but I am doing this for philosophy, not academia. On account of the uniqueness of logic vis-à-vis proof I have refrained from taking the hint that this is a lost cause. This is one occasion when a nil result is to be read as a positive.

I appreciate the advice from one moderator suggesting I make excerpts from the e-book so that the work might be more accessible. I honestly cannot extract meaningful Truths because Truths are a network of relative truths. If Truth could be put on a slab for dissection it would not be Truth. Truth is elusive because it is unadorned and not dissectible. It has to be received as a coherent whole or it disintegrates.